What is a Lawyer Vs Barrister?

Lawyer vs. barrister: this is perhaps one of the most famous debates when it comes to the profession of law. You will find this debate at almost every stage of legal education. Both the barrister and the lawyer will be arguing on the topic. They will both be calling themselves” barrister” and “lawyer”. But what do we actually mean by each of these names and how do we differentiate between the two?

A barrister is described as a barrister in common languages and locations, and yet there is often no confusion about this profession by the individuals. However, the legal profession, which includes the practice of law has a number of different nomenclature for different professionals practicing law like barrister, solicitor, barrister-in-examination, and so on. In fact, the word “barrister” was originally derived from the Middle Dutch word bred, which meant “a judge or official of the High Court”. Later, “barris” became corrupted to become “barri” and then “barry” to become “barry-in-exchange” and eventually” barrister” itself. This can be traced to the time when England changed the name of their High Court from the House of Barris to the House of Justice.

A solicitor, on the other hand, is defined as a barrister who practices law in the courts. Solicitor is also related to the term “solicitor”. In other words, a solicitor is someone who practices law while being a barrister. Thus, the term “solicitor vs barrister” are used interchangeably.

In the Early Modern period, lawyers were primarily magistrates or Justices of Law, while barristers were Common Pleas judges or officers of higher rank than lawyers. The role of the barrister was that of an advocate for his client. He presented his case before the court of law in legal argument. He also argued in court cases, giving the opinion of his fellow attorneys as to the validity or illegality of a certain law or action. Barristers often argued in front of juries, acting as advocates for their clients before the court.

In more modern times, lawyers and barristers have developed a sort of professionalism between themselves which does not exist in earlier days. There is less of a social view towards a barrister since he is only one of three counsel for a client before the court. Lawyers, on the other hand, are viewed as more “businesslike” since they usually act as legal advocates for a client before the court. They are not seen as social workers or human resources workers.

However, there are some differences between lawyers and barristers. The role of a barrister is slightly different from that of a barrister. A barrister represents the interests of his client before the court, whereas a barrister only represents his client’s interest before the court. Also, in a civil case or action, a barrister is obliged to make a legal argument to defend a client.

In a criminal case, on the other hand, a lawyer is considered to be the leader of his case. This is because in criminal cases, the lawyer has to prove his or her client’s innocence to the court and help the client to defend against his or her accused offense. The lawyer tries to prove that the accused is innocent by supplying documentary proof and by further presenting arguments to support such claims. As part of his duty, the lawyer studies the applicable laws of the country and applies them to prove the innocence of the client. He also presents arguments to counter any points brought up by the prosecution.

In a criminal case, a lawyer’s role is crucial because he or she has to present the clients’ side of the story in front of the judge who then makes the final ruling. The lawyer works to free his client from the charges on the basis of his or her arguments and thereby helps the client wins his or her case. A lawyer vs barrister debate can last for hours. Both the sides have often been seen fighting outside the court, especially during tense proceedings.

About the Author

You may also like these